AI Security Atlas › All entries › Autonomous Agent & MCP Security

ThreatHigh severity

Goal Alignment Drift

Long-running agents gradually reinterpret objectives after poisoned memory, competing rewards, or multi-turn adversarial framing.

Open in the interactive atlas →

Impact

Agents pursue shadow goals that violate policy while still appearing task-complete in telemetry.

Why this severity

Impact High × Likelihood Medium = High

Impact high: the agent acts against policy while appearing healthy. Likelihood medium: observed in a 2026 incident where evaluation agents crossed their boundaries, but it needs long-running autonomy.

Impact High: Code execution, credential compromise, exposure of regulated or confidential data, irreversible actions, or system-wide failure.
Likelihood Medium: Publicly demonstrated against real products or in peer-reviewed research, or seen in the wild only with a prior foothold such as stolen credentials.

Method: OWASP Risk Rating Methodology

Evidence

Related

Exploits

Leads to

Mitigated by

Remediation

  1. Checkpoint goals against a signed policy charter each turn.
  2. Separate planner and executor agents with dual-approval on goal changes.
  3. Expire and re-hash agent memory entries with integrity checks.

How to verify

Framework mapping

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026

MITRE ATLAS

NIST AI RMF 1.0