AI Security Atlas › All entries › Model Supply Chain & Training Integrity
Training Data Memorization Leakage
The model reproduces personal data, secrets, or confidential text it memorized during training or fine-tuning.
Open in the interactive atlas →Impact
Privacy breaches and secret exposure that cannot be fixed by access controls, because the data lives in the weights.
Why this severity
Impact High × Likelihood Medium = High
Impact high: regulated data disclosure from the weights. Likelihood medium: extraction from a production model is demonstrated in research.
Impact High: Code execution, credential compromise, exposure of regulated or confidential data, irreversible actions, or system-wide failure.
Likelihood Medium: Publicly demonstrated against real products or in peer-reviewed research, or seen in the wild only with a prior foothold such as stolen credentials.
Method: OWASP Risk Rating Methodology
Evidence
- Research: Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models (arXiv 2311.17035, 2023)
- Research: Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models (arXiv 2012.07805, 2020)
Related
Exploits
- Unscrubbed Fine-Tuning Data Vulnerability · Medium severity
Mitigated by
- PII Scrubbing & Privacy-Preserving Training Guardrail · Fixes high risks
Remediation
- Scrub PII and secrets from training and fine-tuning data.
- Deduplicate data; repeated records are memorized far more often.
- Test released models with extraction prompts and canaries.
How to verify
- Planted canary strings in training data are not reproducible by the released model.
- Membership-inference tests stay near chance on held-out records.
Framework mapping
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025
- LLM02:2025 Sensitive Information Disclosure
MITRE ATLAS
- AML.T0057 LLM Data Leakage
- AML.T0024.000 Exfiltration via AI Inference API: Infer Training Data Membership
NIST AI RMF 1.0
- MEASURE 2.10 Privacy risk of the AI system is examined and documented