AI Security Atlas › All entries › Model Supply Chain & Training Integrity
Unscrubbed Fine-Tuning Data
Support tickets, chat logs, or code used for fine-tuning still contain names, credentials, and confidential details.
Open in the interactive atlas →Impact
Sensitive records become part of the model and can resurface in any user's session.
Why this severity
Impact High × Likelihood Low = Medium
Impact high: personal and secret data enters the weights. Likelihood low: extracting specific records from a fine-tuned model takes many targeted queries.
Impact High: Code execution, credential compromise, exposure of regulated or confidential data, irreversible actions, or system-wide failure.
Likelihood Low: No public cases yet, or the attack needs privileged or insider access.
Method: OWASP Risk Rating Methodology
Evidence
- Research: Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models (arXiv 2012.07805, 2020)
Related
Exploited by
- Training Data Memorization Leakage Threat · High severity
Mitigated by
- PII Scrubbing & Privacy-Preserving Training Guardrail · Fixes high risks
Remediation
- Run PII and secret detectors over every training shard.
- Prefer synthetic or redacted data for fine-tuning.
- Keep a data inventory linking each model to the datasets it saw.
How to verify
- Data pipeline blocks shards with detector hits above threshold.
- Model card lists datasets and their scrubbing status.
Framework mapping
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025
- LLM02:2025 Sensitive Information Disclosure
- LLM04:2025 Data and Model Poisoning
MITRE ATLAS
- AML.T0057 LLM Data Leakage
NIST AI RMF 1.0
- MEASURE 2.10 Privacy risk of the AI system is examined and documented
- MAP 4.1 Risks of AI components, including third-party data and software, are mapped